Recently, a friend of mine invited me into Chicago to
see an improvisation show. We were going to the iO (ImprovOlympic) Theater, a
well-known company among improv players that has pumped out big-name comedy stars
such as Mike Myers and Tina Fey (iO Chicago Theater). My friend, Freddie, had been
taking classes in their own Improv Intensive this summer (check out his blog, The Speed of Lux: LI @ IO, if you want to learn more about what goes on in class) and got free
admission to their troupes’ shows. We were originally planning on seeing one of
their resident troupes, Improv Shakes, an improv team completely devoted to
using Shakespeare’s language in improvisation (sounds super cool, huh?), but
unfortunately the night was completely sold out. So in the true fashion of
improvisation, we had to make an impromptu change of plans. We bought tickets
to the show playing downstairs: their signature piece, The Harold, featuring two resident teams that went by the names of “Henrietta
Pussycat” and “Revolver”.
As we sat down in the intimate little bar room, Freddie
quickly explained to me that The Harold is long-form improvisation. “Long form improv,”
he said, “is what happens when a group of people join together to make
something out of nothing for a long period of time. Sometimes long-form is a collection
of scenes, sometimes it’s a single scene that goes on for a long time. Whatever
shape it takes, long form improv is the product of our imaginations when we set
them free.” This type of improvisation was born and bred in the iO Theater; created
by Charna Halpern and Del Close, the two believed “that improv was capable of
more than the short games and competition-style shows… a deeper, more robust
form of improvisation based on trust and agreement” could be possible. What
makes that any different from Who’s Line
Is It Anyway?, you may wonder. I wondered as well, but I was able to see
right away just how unique The Harold was.
The lights dimmed,
and the first player came on stage. He shamelessly plugged the bar (a unique
feature at iO Theater – drinks and a show!), introduced the troupe, took a
suggestion of a noun (“CATFISH!” someone in the back yelled) and hilarity
ensued. The team clustered together at the front of the stage, all observing an
invisible catfish, and a team member spoke up. He began describing the beauty
of the catfish as if we had just flipped to the nature channel on TV. When one
of the members decided to venture his way into the catfish’s mouth, sexual
innuendos started coming up in the scene: “Enter the space slowly, stroking its
tentacles tenderly,” Our nature guide began, taking the cue from his partner’s
action. The audience laughed at his suddenly seductive tone.
This must have triggered an idea in another member because
a man in the back of the cluster suddenly stepped out of the group and walked in
front of all his team members. It was as if he was wiping the slate clean – all
the other members immediately took his cue and turned on the spot to stand at
the back of the stage to begin the new story he had brewing in his mind – scene
change! All of a sudden, we were watching a teenage boy in the “deep south” asking
for permission from a thick-accented, sex-crazed mother (played by a male
member of the team!) to date her daughter (played by another male member!).
The night went on in this specific fashion. Each
“scene” arcing as any story would until something was said that triggered a new
idea among the members. It was exciting to watch a scene unfold and try to
guess what line of dialogue would give birth to a new idea and who would begin
the next scene by wiping the slate clean again. In this way, each story was interwoven
by the links in ideas – how else could they have started studying catfish and
ended up raving about Dorito-flavored Taco Bell shells and building a time
machine so they could sign the Declaration of Independence. The scenes continued
until the whole team triggered enough ideas to circle them back to their nature
channel cluster.
This was a very
unique form of improv, indeed! I could tell that these were professional improvers who studied their
craft intensely – there was a method to their madness. Watching the team play,
I could see that even though the dialogue
was improvised they had definitely rehearsed the style and flow of the show.
Stock actions were set (the wiping of the slate, for example) as an outline, a
foundation, and the team built on this outline to create fresh and funny scenes.
Without this outline, transforming little scenes into an eventual interlinking
story would probably be near impossible, and transitions would definitely not
be as tight and precise as they were. These people weren’t just playing a game,
these people were actors. They took
their cues from their scene partners, playing off each other’s dialogue to
develop a story, giving the spotlight and taking the spotlight, creating
characters, and saying “yes” when a team member wiped the slate, allowing a
new scene to unfold. There was an arc. I could follow the rise in action,
climax, and fall in action of the whole show. There was technique. I could pick
out (recalling lessons from an old theatre class) standard “rules of comedy” –
Comedy in 3s, the Snowball Effect, Repetition. And the cherry on top was that
it was all highly entertaining and quite hilarious!
The iO Theater is located
on Clark Street in Chicago – right across the street from Wrigley Field – and there
is something happening every night, so you will never be bored. A warning,
however: the humor will be crass, and
expletives and sexual innuendos will be
dropped – not a show to bring the kids to. The night was geared towards 20- and
30-somethings (or 20- and 30-somethings at heart!), so if you’re looking for a
good laugh, I wouldn’t pass it up. This company is definitely a must if you
want to see improv at the top of its game!